Should parents be held legally responsible for the actions of their children. Do you agree with this opinion? Support your position with your own study ,experience and observation.
The importance of parents should hold legally responsible for the actions of their children, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of parents should hold legally responsible for the actions of their children has sparked controversy over the potential impact of this trend on the whole society in recent years. It can be agreed that parents play a vital on their children, though it has drawbacks. This essay will elaborate on how children are unable to afford their faults and how juvenile delinquency has increased by a lack of parents supervision, and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerable reasons why parents should be legally responsible for their children, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact is children are unable to afford their mistakes. As an illustration, My brother broke up his classroom window which was valued six hundred dollars, but he cannot afford this money although he did apologize sincerely to his teachers. Therefore, parents should be held legally responsible for their children.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that children should be responsible by themselves as there are innumerable reasons but the most salient one is that consecutively increasing juvenile delinquency. For instance, the research has invariably revealed that China’s juvenile delinquency rate has dramatically increased five times compared with 2016 after legal parent policy was introduced to the whole society. Thus, parents should not legally responsible for the actions of their children.
In conclusion, from what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of parents' legally responsible for their children is prominent, although juvenile delinquency should be well handled.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49295774648 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95790576365 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528169014085 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 472.5 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.11749775 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.818181818 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8181818182 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363813162922 0.242375264174 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188315926964 0.0925447433944 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109570840273 0.071462118173 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242697603257 0.151781067708 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307171603883 0.0609392437508 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.