In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting?
Recently, the phenomenon of the voting system and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although challenged by many that the matter of compulsory voting is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by some individuals. I am inclined to believe that the mandatory notion of voting can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, an inevitable voting system might increase some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of an unhappy society, as well as democratic politicians, are inevitably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the relation between voting by force and the republicans party. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both western countries and a computer-based voting system apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, a voluntary voting system might increase the consequences of democratic parties. Moreover, fundamental aspects of a free society would relate to this reality that the demerits of the right to freedom pertain to political decisions. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the nation's right is correlated negatively with political treatments. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of political candidates.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the notion of the compulsory voting system far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the mandatory voting policy proves the significance of different countries, but also pinpoint political implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iety, as well as democratic politicians, are inevitably bound up. According to my...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58455882353 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20095200683 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599264705882 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8265300455 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.583333333 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272875832097 0.242375264174 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908656580203 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404039699672 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158868870407 0.151781067708 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429691465553 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.