Some countries encourage teenagers to have the part job and see it as a good thing while others disagree with this phenomena. Give your opinion and explain both sides.
It is a highly debatable issue that teenagers should do the part-time job or not while doing the study. Some people believe that is good to follow while some ignore this notion. In this essay, I am going to deliver necessary arguments before jumping to conclusion.
To begin with the positive side, There are myriad benefits of doing the part-time job with the study but the most conspicuous one is, doing the part-time job with the study, one can have the broad view about their future goals. Moreover, doing a part-time job with the study, one can support their family in a crucial time and become independent. Further, they do not need to demand money from their parents for routine expenses like the mobile bill, fuel and so on. For example, as per the survey in America which claims that almost 85% of a student doing a part-time job and supporting their family.
However, There are also pitfalls exist with the above points. Firstly, while doing a part-time job, students are not able to focus on their studies and as a result, they either get the fewer marks or fail in the study. For instance, as per the recent survey by the Oxford University, which claims that around 75% of the students getting law grades and as a result, they fail to achieve their desired goal in short time compared to others.
To sum up, with the aforementioned point, one can conclude that doing a part job is good practice but it should not be at the cost of the future.
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 82
- Action speaks louder than words. Discuss 72
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education agree or disagree or experience is a more effective way to teach compared to boos agree or disagree 79
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 88
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree. ? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is a highly debatable issue that teen...
^^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hould not be at the cost of the future.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in short, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1206.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62068965517 5.00649968141 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32115615312 2.71678728327 85% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 379.143842365 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.57093596059 89% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5011032538 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.636363636 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9090909091 7.25397266985 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174922634154 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799681165618 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585872636166 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123357000356 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054078132115 0.0609392437508 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.1260098522 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.5310837438 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.