Some organizations integrate employees in decision making process of their goods and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this.

Essay topics:

Some organizations integrate employees in decision making process of their goods and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this.

Indeed, many companies involved their employees in the policy making process of goods and services. This essay will discuss the merits and demerits of their participation in this process.

Participation of employees builds a strong organization structure; this kind of structure improves the information flow. Sharing of idea is open and every employee discusses their views without any hesitation and embarrassment. Employees feel motivated and share their views with other members for the benefits of the company. When they are involved, company enjoys win-win situation. Their participation has proved beneficial for some of the companies. The productivity level has also accelerated of those companies where employees are involved in the decision making process.

The main disadvantage of involving them in this process is that some of the workers are not trustworthy. Some of them share the ideas of the company with the rival party which are discussed in the company board meetings. Moreover, owing to different views and opinion of every employee gives birth to quarrel. Therefore, I feel these are the major problems confronted by the companies when they take participation of their employees.

Thus, I believe, although participation of the employees is better, their participation is not lucrative when some of them share the agenda with the rival party.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...participation has proved beneficial for some of the companies. The productivity level has a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... involving them in this process is that some of the workers are not trustworthy. Some of th...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, i feel, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1165.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 211.0 242.827586207 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52132701422 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9788530148 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 139.433497537 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535545023697 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 357.3 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.51365802 50.4703680194 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.6153846154 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2307692308 20.9669160288 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 7.25397266985 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364835366777 0.242375264174 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130913693622 0.0925447433944 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881703777575 0.071462118173 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23675032025 0.151781067708 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113264043017 0.0609392437508 186% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.1260098522 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.