Some people believe the large shopping malls are replacing local shops which is bad for local economies. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of shopping at the large malls are replacing local shops and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures, is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that shopping in the large malls can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, shopping from the local shops can provide the society with some noticeable effects includes decreasing expenses through to inclining of purchasing, available essential daily goods and easily accessible markets which are rooted in the fact that the providing the merchandise, as well as exciting tremendous shopping locations, are inextricably bound up. From my own experience, when I was a student university, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that local shops can increase job opportunities. Thus beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated issues apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, shopping from the large malls might increase some consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct the preconceived notions of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of shopping from the large malls far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...l shops can increase job opportunities. Thus beneficial ramifications of both this c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7032967033 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18841692626 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637362637363 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.2729468596 50.4703680194 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.545454545 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302130472893 0.242375264174 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106355362485 0.0925447433944 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100843097797 0.071462118173 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171948093771 0.151781067708 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631208285222 0.0609392437508 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.