Some people could stay effective in their lives by doing the repetitive routine, such as eating the same diet. Do you think it can apply to everyone?

Some people always do same things for their entire life, where as others try to learn something out of change. I personally feel that change is always good and doing things routinely may cause problems.

There are some valid reasons why some people feel the need to make significant changes to their lives from time to time. Any new situation can be a learning opportunity and person grows from it. For example, a new job can present new challenges that force the person to acquire new knowledge. Recently, as part of organisational changes, I was asked to move to a new IT team. I knew that it was not an easy thing to work in an entirely new team and on a new technology. I accepted the challenge and within few months I have well adapted to the new environment and learned the new technology. It was very hard, but the sense of achievement was huge.

On the other hand, some people keep on doing the same things repeatedly. This may cause monotony of the work they are doing and eventually they lose interest on the task they are doing which may lead to faults. One of my friends was a typist. He was in that profession for almost 10 years. Initially it was fine, but as the time gone by he lost all his interest in typing and ended up with lots of typos in documents he typed. He changed his profession upon my suggestion and he is very happy now.

Based on my two experiences explained above, I strongly believe that change is necessary for everyone for the interesting and challenging life.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...s do same things for their entire life, where as others try to learn something out of ch...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'teams'?
Suggestion: teams
...hanges, I was asked to move to a new IT team. I knew that it was not an easy thing t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'by the lost'?
Suggestion: by the lost
...ially it was fine, but as the time gone by he lost all his interest in typing and ended up...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, well, for example, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 20.9802955665 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1232.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49635036496 5.00649968141 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55157258771 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569343065693 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.57093596059 89% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6091915723 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.0 104.977214359 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 20.9669160288 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 7.25397266985 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144906675655 0.242375264174 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495028283841 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705736973933 0.071462118173 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0900539934679 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550924288484 0.0609392437508 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 12.6369458128 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.1260098522 134% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.9458128079 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.52 11.5310837438 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.32886699507 88% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 55.0591133005 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.