Recently, the phenomenon of being good talkers and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of good speakers is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded both constructive and positive by a number of substantial individuals. I am inclined to believe that expert speakers can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, active listeners can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of speaking skills as well as listening abilities are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered important listening techniques. Thus, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of silent people.
Within the realm of science, talking effectively might increase the consequences of talking new strategies. Moreover, fundamental aspects of passive learning could relate to the reality that the demerits of talkative students pertain to talented listeners. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of talking disorder is correlated negatively with hearing difficulties.
To conclude, although there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the effects of listening carefully far outweigh its drawback. Not only do the advantages of perfect speaking methods prove the significance of hearing problems, but also pinpoint better speaker implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72573839662 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16493387348 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683544303797 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0540956522 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.363636364 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 7.25397266985 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20973010625 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602295143183 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08031716193 0.071462118173 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0972561068123 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0888466508784 0.0609392437508 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.14 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.