I agree with people who say that too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills, in all levels of education.
Since I was child, I've been studying in different sorts of institution and I could realise- mainly when I started to work - that most of the time we spend more time in 'what' or 'why' do something than 'how' do it.
For sure I believe it's important to know the theory through what 'things works'. This knowledge encourage the reflection, the research and so on.
That's why the education standard is: in one side there is a teacher explaining the subject and in another side there are the students trying to learn everything.
Usually, there are few practical classes, when we can really develop our skills, for example: laboratory and computer classes.
Even in my university course - industrial engineering- there are few practical tasks.
That's why I think the structure of education could be more balanced in terms of theory and practical skills. In this way people would be more capable to cope with personal and professional problems.
I believe that some institutions have already realised the importance of this balanced education. Some evidence to prove it: the increasing number of study cases and tasks which involve real problem like solving a marketing problem in a real company. Other evidence is the increasing number of MBAs offered around the world.
Therefore, I agree that we need to promote more the practical skills, but, as I see it, this change has been occurring.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 20, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I've
...evels of education. Since I was child, Ive been studying in different sorts of ins...
^^^
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'encourages'.
Suggestion: encourages
...rough what things works. This knowledge encourage the reflection, the research and so on....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...he reflection, the research and so on. Thats why the education standard is: in one s...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...versity course - industrial engineering- there are few practical tasks. Thats wh...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...ering- there are few practical tasks. Thats why I think the structure of education ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, really, so, therefore, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91891891892 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66417728523 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606177606178 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0431719685 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.25397266985 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.12807881773 218% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263439180041 0.242375264174 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884798508313 0.0925447433944 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.179380008525 0.071462118173 251% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119296154574 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.207574671265 0.0609392437508 341% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.32886699507 93% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 55.0591133005 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.