Sometimes, in interviews, some employers ask job's candidate for personal information such as hobbies and interests, or family situation.
Some people think that information should be confidential and candidats for jobs don't have to give private information to employers.
For instance, in a suburb of Paris, people applying for jobs said in their curriculum vitae, they lived in a very impopular suburb and they practiced Rap music. This people hadn't been choose for the position while they had all the skills and degrees for it.
In this case, personal information can be the cause of a kind of "discrimination ".
In the other hand, some employers prefer to have very united work's team because they think it's a factor to improve rentability in companies. In this case, personal information such as hobbies and interests could be very precious.
Finally, a work's team who share the same interests and hobbies is more performing because of the good relationships between each member.
Secondly, a man applying for jobs, who have hobbies and interests, shows that he have a balanced life. It's the same for a woman.
In my opinion, give some personal information when I have an interview for a job could be a way of talking about me. I think an employer have to know which person he has in front of him. It's much more important if the position request responsibility.
At final, even so sometimes it's not really relevant or useful to give personal information for people applying for job, most of employers have to know their interests, hobbies, or familiar situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 82, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... be confidential and candidats for jobs dont have to give private information to emp...
^^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...ar suburb and they practiced Rap music. This people hadnt been choose for the positi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
...d they practiced Rap music. This people hadnt been choose for the position while they...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'chosen'.
Suggestion: chosen
...ticed Rap music. This people hadnt been choose for the position while they had all the...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ry united works team because they think its a factor to improve rentability in comp...
^^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...or to improve rentability in companies. In this case, personal information such as...
^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...ts, shows that he have a balanced life. Its the same for a woman. In my opinion, g...
^^^
Line 9, column 29, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...sibility. At final, even so sometimes its not really relevant or useful to give p...
^^^
Line 9, column 121, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the employers') or simply say ''most employers''.
Suggestion: most of the employers; most employers
...nformation for people applying for job, most of employers have to know their interests, hobbies, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, really, second, secondly, so, while, even so, for instance, i think, kind of, such as, talking about, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02661596958 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94350610577 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524714828897 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5314409512 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4285714286 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.38176352705 205% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413311492456 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142628361598 0.084324248473 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934564528392 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183155332683 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0905017353251 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.