It is said that art was important part of all cultures in the world. But in recent scenario, people choose science, technology and business against of arts. It is because people nowadays think that art is waste of time and it produces nothing but just to entertainment. I think, people should have to give equal respect to art as science, technology and business have to justify its important role in daily life.
Firstly, art represents different cultures from different perspective in many ways like dancing, painting, singing. Even art is very useful to learn about different cultures and to spend some quality time with self. Nowadays, many artists are able to gain fame and money with the help of art. Art breaks all berriers of cast, race religions and brings different people so close.
On the other hand, some people give more important to science, technology and business as they want to become more successful in life and they consider art is not capable to achieve that success in life. However, to change their mind in this scenario, we need to promote art in school education system. So children should learn about different types of art and they value them in their life. Governments has to arrange art exhibition from time to time so that people visit it and learn more about art. Moreover, by promoting art on international level, people value art in their life.
In conclusion, science, technology and business are more important to achieve economical growth but people do not have to underestimate the power of art as it helps them to grow in knowledge and entertain them in their lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... business are more important to achieve economical growth but people do not have to undere...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, as to, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89416058394 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58354207394 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496350364964 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0107130105 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7857142857 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284202652537 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11496592585 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440588885327 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180668952792 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442448557605 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 78.4519038076 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.