Some people think air travel has more negative impacts than positive impacts on modern life. What do you think?
Recently, the phenomenon of travelling in the air and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of speed transport is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that modern life style can be a plus, and I will analyze that troughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, travelling by airplanes can provide the society with some noticable effects which are rooted in tha fact that the merits of airports management as well as public transport are inextricably bound up. Accroding to my own experience when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered online ticketing. Therefore, beneficial ramifications of private cars apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, commuting by airlanes might increase the consequences of urban traffic issues. Moreover, fundamental aspects of travel policies could relate to this reality that the demerits of promoting air travel pertain to air pollution. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of travelling agencies, as well as fossil fules are negatively correlated. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of environmentally friendly mean of travel.
In conclusion, while there are several compeling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefites of using airplanes far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of air travel issues prove the significance of airport's requirements, but also pinpoint human life style application. applications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50384615385 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17110428193 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653846153846 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 12.6551724138 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 260.0 20.5024630542 1268% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 50.4703680194 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1431.0 104.977214359 1363% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 260.0 20.9669160288 1240% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 97.0 7.25397266985 1337% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 6.9802955665 14% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169045139781 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169045139781 0.0925447433944 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.071462118173 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895583013988 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399056286207 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 134.5 12.6369458128 1064% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -209.34 53.1260098522 -394% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.54236453202 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 107.1 10.9458128079 978% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 16.1 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 22.79 8.32886699507 274% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 9.94827586207 583% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 106.0 10.3980295567 1019% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 58.0 10.5123152709 552% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.