Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of banding cars from cities has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “would it be beneficial to the environment?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that cars should be banned from large cities, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the environmental standpoint, the pollution caused by cars are bound up inextricably with fuel fossils, which indicates they lead to both the CO2 emissions and global warming. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between urban crawl and annoying noises as well as an exponential increase in traffic jam. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of devastating impacts is correlated positively with not only lack of surveillance but also globalization.
Within the realm of transportation, without the slightest doubt, public transportation attribute to buses, in that it would come down to metro, airplanes, and railways. A salient example of such attribution is a hidden agenda, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take an alternative solution for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint current system problems. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of education and surveillance .
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the advantages of banding cars outweigh its disadvantages. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e slightest doubt, public transportation attribute to buses, in that it would com...
^^
Line 5, column 592, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...votal role of education and surveillance . To conclude, as for myself, as the s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58450704225 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28909892602 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.693661971831 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5759152813 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157032277009 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451499230373 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052020905907 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892682386096 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634249190081 0.0609392437508 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.