Recently the phenomenon of keeping a pet has been good or dangerous for children and its corresponding impact sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that matter, of keeping pets at home is highly beneficial for children, such issues regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that keeping away children from pets can be a plus. I will discuss the controversial aspect of that throughout this essay.
On the one hand, form the general standpoint, by providing a shelter for pets at home can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of critical issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own example, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the current policies. Thus, a beneficial ramification of both this common trend and its effects apparently can be seen
On the other hand, within the realm of science, Unhealthy pets might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, the fundamental aspect of pets that leak Childe body or any other parts with it though might increase the chance of disease. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by the prestigious university has asserted that the downside of caring pets at home is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, It's correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To sum up, it can be seen that while there are several compelling arguments on both sides I profoundly believe that the benefits of keeping pets for children far outweigh its drawback. Not only do the advantage of this unique phenomena proves the significance of total outcomes but also social implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d and its effects apparently can be seen On the other hand, within the realm of s...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23287671233 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97895602862 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606164383562 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1043756837 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.333333333 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.25397266985 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250805142722 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828025058731 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053052503658 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14262581191 0.151781067708 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489037643265 0.0609392437508 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.