Recently, the phenomenon of that computer made us smarter and happier and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the computer in term of productivity is highly beneficial, such issue regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that computer made life much productive and easier can be plus, and I will explain that throughout this essay.
On the one hand, from a social standpoint, the computer makes a person’s life more productive and much happier and easier. Which are rooted in the fact that computer does multiple tasks on one hand as well as provide a very effective output for human are inextricably bound up. According to my own example, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which shows that computer has the ability to perform several tasks in a minute such as copy-pest files, software installation and downloading a file from the internet. Thus, beneficial ramification of both computer multitasking skills and productive ability can be seen.
On the other hand, within the realm of science computer have failed some point to prove its proactive ability and which might increase the consequences of its working accuracies. Moreover, fundamental aspect of computer operations could relate to this reality that the demerits of human error pertain to careless human behavior. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of human carelessness toward their work is correlated negatively with lake ability to perform a task. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this common phenomenon.
To sum up, it can be seen that, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of a computer are far out weighted its drawbacks in a person’s life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...consequences of its working accuracies. Moreover, fundamental aspect of computer...
^^
Line 5, column 558, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h lake ability to perform a task. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceive...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 314.0 242.827586207 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28343949045 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04273489286 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582802547771 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.7121506369 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.25 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.25397266985 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194058493537 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717231042641 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473654078346 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108705641618 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586485601908 0.0609392437508 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.