Recently the phenomenon of expression that people are killing in the war of ideas and its corresponding impact has heated debate. Although contested by many that many common men suffered a lot from the group of ideology, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individual. I am incline to believe that a single idea from an ordinary man does not stand among a groups ideology can be plus and I will explain that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to support this sentence as a right opinion. At first, among different ideas, an individual thought might be very constructive. But, what will happen to this vision inside an opposition? They never agree with a single thought. For example, when I was a University student, In our research group I had a good idea to experiment objects which it dismissed from group members that did not want to accept its advantages.
In addition, it is better for a person to leave the group. It is important for an idea to express in a group agrees. However, among the people who act against you, your idea will be killed. For instance, a recent research conducted by MIT University researchers in 2016 has shown that a significant number of unique thoughts are fading and killing by strong opposing groups.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of an individual with an idea far outweigh its drawback.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 332, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'inclined'.
Suggestion: inclined
... substantial number of individual. I am incline to believe that a single idea from an o...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 414, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
... an ordinary man does not stand among a groups ideology can be plus and I will explain...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91732283465 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79391394139 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61811023622 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3428851769 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0769230769 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157971660424 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562819737592 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372366144931 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0887271145197 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489908748934 0.0609392437508 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.