Recently the phenomenon of keeping a pet is good or dangerous for children and its corresponding impact sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that matter of keeping pets at home is highly beneficial for children, such issues regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that keeping away children from pets can be puls. I will discuss the controversial aspect of that throughout this essay.
On the one hand, form the general standpoint, by provideing a salter to pets at home can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of critical issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own example, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the current policies. Thus, beneficial ramification of both this common trend and its effects apparently can be seen
On the other hand, within the realm of science, Unhealthy pers might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, the fundamental aspect of pets that leak childe body or any other parts with its though might increase the chance of disease. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by the prestigious university has asserted that the downside of caring pets at home is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, It's correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To sum up, it can be seen that while there are several compiling arguments on both sides I profoundly believe that the benefits of keeping pets for children far outweigh its drawback. Not only do the advantage of this unique phenomena prove the significance of total outcomes but also social implications.
- Team sports are generally promoted as a great way to keep fit and build character. However, sporting events such as soccer matches are often accompanied by violence between rival supporters and other forms of antisocial behavior. If sporting events cause 88
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? Discuss both options. 85
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? Discuss both options. 88
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 85
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 491, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d and its effects apparently can be seen On the other hand, within the realm of s...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26643598616 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97284397026 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612456747405 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0306934904 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.833333333 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.25397266985 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238028687665 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796769708565 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551912665412 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135734982622 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556907584876 0.0609392437508 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.