Some people think that schools should select students according to their academics abilities while believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your opinion?
Surely there has been no time in the history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on the typical day reveals selection of students in schools according to their abilities has been one the most prominent topics in the contemporary discussion. People have always been intrigued to analyze and explain whether there should be partiality between pupils while giving admission. I will elaborate this notion in the further paragraphs.
To begin with, there are myriad merits of collaborative education. The first and foremost, there is competition among all students and do hard word a lot. As a case in point, Delhi public school has great name and fame due to its education quality.
On the contrary, every rose has its own thorns so there are some pitfalls of it. Firstly, every student have right of getting better education regardless of their academic background. Moving ahead, some pupils can’t get admission according to their own schools as well as percentage. Lastly, some children get disappointed because they cannot get their favorite subjects.
To conclude, although there are some benefits of studying according to their academic skills yet advantages of getting knowledge in class having different capabilities are endless. Therefore, accruing to my perspective, equal education should be provided to every individual because every individual specializes in particular field.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, lastly, so, therefore, well, while, in particular, as well as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1214.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 222.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46846846847 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87305475632 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644144144144 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1894994707 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3846153846 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0769230769 20.9669160288 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.25397266985 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283914806216 0.242375264174 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819053978273 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668422796007 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141575683566 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459420126796 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.