Nowadays, there is debate among people regarding work and personal life balance. Whereas some individual prefers to work hard for success in their career, the others in opinion to spend time with family. I am inclined to believe that free time for self is the best choice. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason that spending time with family is equally important. According to my own experience, In my office, people who spend time with their family and give time to themselves do better at work. Thus, the beneficial ramification of spending the time on themselves apparently can be seen.
On the contrary, skeptics conjecture that it is necessary to work hard and spend long hours at work to become successful. Although it seems ostensibly veridical, this is the one-sided view. Spending time on themselves is equally important. Hence, It is correct to assume the preconceived notion.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both the side, the benefits of spending time for themselves far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of spending time with family prove its significance, but also pinpoints implications of not doing it.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, regarding, so, then, thus, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1128.0 1207.87684729 93% => OK
No of words: 219.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15068493151 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75398117913 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 139.433497537 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584474885845 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 379.143842365 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8212680708 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7692307692 104.977214359 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8461538462 20.9669160288 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371087444766 0.242375264174 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125384498785 0.0925447433944 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980611662955 0.071462118173 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218829662349 0.151781067708 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0852354230005 0.0609392437508 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 56.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.