some people work for long hours and hard to achieve success and some give importance to free time for them. give your opinion and discuss your views.
nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have any time for their personal life.
discuss work-life balance.
Recently, the phenomenon of working long hours and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that achieving success highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that free time can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the spare time standpoint, the long hour's work can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that spending time at work, as well as allocating your time, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered bonus. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both part-time job and personal life can be seen.
Within the realm of unemployment, burning at work might increase the consequences of gifted work. Moreover, fundamental aspects of financial reward relate to this reality that the demerits of working overtime pertain to productivity. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of career progression is correlated negatively with the climbing career ladder. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of accomplishment.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of hard-working far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of being diligent prove the significance of perks, but also pinpoints of being consistent implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 202, Rule ID: PROVE_PROOF[2]
Message: Did you mean 'proof' (noun) instead of prove (verb)?
Suggestion: proof
...nly do the advantages of being diligent prove the significance of perks, but also pin...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57142857143 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24584506779 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677551020408 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6380112107 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.75 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4166666667 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209562203575 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613175469745 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697802420879 0.071462118173 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108414534493 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631180276597 0.0609392437508 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.75 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.