Recently, the phenomenon of working hard to achieve success or giving importance to free time and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that incraesing leisure time is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and posivite by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that having free time to relax is a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, considering enough free time in lfe's routine can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that a happy community, as well as content and energitic individuals, are inexrtacably bound up. According to mu own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered happiness in society where people have much spare time. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both social interactions and personal desire apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of professional career, working for long hours to achieve success might increase the consequences of ignorance. Moreover, fundamental aspects of doing recreational activities relate to this reality hat demerits of spending too much time in workplace pertain to losing concentration. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of free time.
to conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profounly believe that benefits of giving importance to free time far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of leisure time prove the significance of relaxation, but also pinpoint professional career implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...he preconceived notion of free time. to conclude, while there are several compe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56916996047 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18539803035 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675889328063 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1893336762 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.090909091 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330671714428 0.242375264174 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107473324923 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650740869169 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17496109888 0.151781067708 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539156813467 0.0609392437508 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.