Some say that music is as important as other subjects in school to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion.

Recently, the phenomenon of music as a major course in schools and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that learning music academically is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that improving music classes can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, teaching students to play musical instruments can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that entertainment, as well as cultural issues, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered positive effect of music in children's attitude. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both experimental and theoretical lessons apparently can be seen.
Within the reals of psychology, promoting music in schools might increase the consequences of cognitive skills. Moreover, fundamental aspects of playing music in classrooms relate to this reality that the demerits of theory-based courses pertain to a rigid structure. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of leaving music as a basic subject is correlated negatively with an unhappy society. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of teaching music in schools.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of music learning for outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of learning this subject prove the significance of children life, but also pinpoint future career implications.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6282527881 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25509636634 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646840148699 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6271789929 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.166666667 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192358521402 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644149159135 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447249431807 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111300197928 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394909050246 0.0609392437508 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.