Recently, the phenomenon of the environment and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that endangered environment is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the government role can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From preserving environment standpoint, protecting the environment can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the global warming, as well as environmental problems, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered rising sea-level. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both melting icebergs and pollutant particles can be seen.
Within the realm of the atmosphere, the biosphere might increase the consequences of the geothermal energy. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the glaciation relate to this reality that the demerits of drought pertain to contamination. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of rising environmental temperature is correlated negatively with the carbon emission. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of noxious gases.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the green tax far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantage of preserving the atmosphere disorders prove the significance of the environmental damage, but also pinpoint x implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76706827309 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41172163557 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654618473896 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4980921456 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0559275808034 0.242375264174 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0171568070243 0.0925447433944 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0206654297858 0.071462118173 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0309261257232 0.151781067708 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0108154175556 0.0609392437508 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.03 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.