is tourism in less developed countries advantage or disadvantage? discuss your views and give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of the tourism and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that in less developed countries highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that advantage of tourism can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the job opportunities standpoint, income source can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that tourism, as well as globalization, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered tourism culture. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both cultural openness and the broaden horizon can be seen.
Within the realm of foreign culture, a fear of losing identity might increase the consequences of tourism agency. Moreover, fundamental aspects of booking a flight relate to this reality that the demerits of tourist accommodation pertain to the annual influx of tourism. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of tourism welfare is correlated negatively with extreme tourism. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of mass tourism.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of tourism traffic far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of improving culture prove the significance of niche tourism, but also pinpoints of social interaction implications
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...fications of both cultural openness and the broaden horizon can be seen. Within the real...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roving culture prove the significance of niche tourism, but also pinpoints of soc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61354581673 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21098236858 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661354581673 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8266330337 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.416666667 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151527774635 0.242375264174 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508785595986 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.027144926709 0.071462118173 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0875269055277 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383285514322 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.11 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.