In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. do you think it is a good idea or not? give your reasons?
Recently, the phenomenon of the education system and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although it is contested by many that the written test is highly potential, such issues are regarded as thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the traditional education system can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.
From the continuous assessment standpoint, the passing test can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that getting the good mark, as well as the oral examination, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered the student evaluation. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the education equity and the education quality can be seen.
Within the realm of the modern testing method, the formal examination might increase the consequences of practical training. Moreover, fundamental aspects of being vulnerable to cheating relate to this reality that the demerits of the pupil appraisal pertain to the academic achievement. As a tangible example, a scientific research that undertook by the prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of the test-taking strategies are correlated negatively with fundamental knowledge. Hence, it is correct to presume that the preconceived notion of failing test.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of performance far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantage of a time-limited test prove the significance of taking an open-book test, but also pinpoint solid education implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'scientific research'.
Suggestion: scientific research
...mic achievement. As a tangible example, a scientific research that undertook by the prestigious unive...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59636363636 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23165336493 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3631784559 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.25 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108771694426 0.242375264174 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033758260734 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306430500836 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0602424016838 0.151781067708 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420931663074 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.