mass media
Recently, the phenomenon of the mass media and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the propaganda highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that broadcasting can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the local media standpoint, the national media can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the global media, as well as the advertisement, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered the best entertainment. Thus, beneficial ramifications for both target audience and globalization can be seen.
Within the realm of the global village, keeping up with the latest news might increase the consequences of the politic influences. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the national media relate to this reality that the demerits of the satellite pertain to the social influence. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of economic news is correlated negatively with the eye-strain in 80 percent of people. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the press.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the favorite media far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the print media prove the significance of bringing the world closer together, but also pinpoints of the popular media implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42965779468 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2035388274 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631178707224 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7894025641 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293565405089 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845327850046 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114740285086 0.071462118173 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148954339993 0.151781067708 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571428786371 0.0609392437508 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.74 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.