Recently, the phenomenon of the illiterates and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although it is contested by many that reading is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the writing can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From enable intellectual property, hard working can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that gifted person, as well as inspiration, are inextricably bound up. As according to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experience which deciphered 80 percent could not read and write. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both the widespread use of computer and modern society can be seen.
Within the realm of lack of role model, being diligent might increase the consequences of consistent with learning. Moreover, the fundamental essence of the broaden your horizon relate to this reality that the demerits of being self-motivated pertain to internal emotion. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of innate talent is correlated negatively with unable working with new technologies. Hence, it is correct to presume that the preconceived notion of bringing out the best.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of academic achievement far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantage of the solid education prove the significance of the traditional education system, but also the pinpoint improving your skill implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...g. Moreover, the fundamental essence of the broaden your horizon relate to this reality tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47955390335 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18226470301 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657992565056 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 1.71428571429 350% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8068005346 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.833333333 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0633441414604 0.242375264174 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0206770669546 0.0925447433944 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0203941706703 0.071462118173 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0360654845947 0.151781067708 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285074510117 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.89 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.