Mass media
Recently, the phenomenon of mass media and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the national media highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the local media can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the propaganda standpoint, the advertisement can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that social effect, as well as political effect, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered 80% broadcasting effect. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both globalization and global effect can be seen.
Within the realm of the target audience, the popular media might increase the consequences of keeping up with the latest news. Moreover, fundamental aspects of entertainment related to this reality that the demerits of social media pertaining to print media. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of cultural openness is correlated negatively with the press. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the media campaign.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of bringing the world closer together far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages to acquiring the latest news prove the significance the mainstream media x, but also pinpoints of x implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51968503937 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19890551064 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653543307087 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4942275615 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.833333333 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284726571575 0.242375264174 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977105138706 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102589056138 0.071462118173 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152454608606 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122950676588 0.0609392437508 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.89 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.