do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? what is the reason for that?
Recently, the phenomenon of dangerous activities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that extreme sports highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that famous sports can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From adventure sports standpoint, facing up the challenge can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that overcome with fears, as well as social characteristic, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered developing self-confidence. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both body reactions and the stressful situation can be seen.
Within the realm of life-threatening practice, have the rush of adrenaline might increase the consequences of risk-taking sports. Moreover, fundamental aspects of unusual experience relate to this reality that the demerits of lucrative sports pertain to trying new occasion. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of light exercise is correlated negatively with the sportsman. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of spectators.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of workout far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of dangerous activities prove the significance of dying from participating, but also pinpoints of mediocre athlete implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 248.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81451612903 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40864879043 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.681451612903 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3813266522 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.166666667 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.058913052729 0.242375264174 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0203453092758 0.0925447433944 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393199786726 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.03660940848 0.151781067708 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368372927731 0.0609392437508 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.0 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.