euthanasia is no longer acceptable in the modern society. discuss the solutions to accept this fact
Recently, the phenomenon of euthanasia and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although it is contested by many that the modern society is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the dying quickly can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From withdrawing the medical aid, lethargy can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merciful dye, as well as a voluntary death, are inextricably bound up. As according to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experience which deciphered 80 percent suffering from chronic conditions. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both hopelessness and a painless death can be seen.
Within the realm of irreversible coma, committing suicide might increase the consequences of dying quickly. Moreover, the fundamental essence of herbal remedies relate to this reality that the demerits of incurable disease pertain to being terminally ill. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of devastating disease is correlated negatively with the happy death. Hence, it is correct to presume that the preconceived notion of physical disorders.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of patient far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantage of termination of life prove the significance of doctor, but also the pinpoint the sickness implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51171875 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20258903671 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66796875 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 1.71428571429 350% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5950306243 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.583333333 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0525375613592 0.242375264174 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.016046411855 0.0925447433944 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0194132721566 0.071462118173 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0279005285728 0.151781067708 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272388253777 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.91 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.