Recently, the phenomenon of dangerous activities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that skiing highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that skydiving can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From bungee jumping standpoint, the stressful situation can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that developing your character, as well as taking the risk sports, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered 80% of sportsman overcoming with their fear. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both fame and money can be seen.
Within the realm of expensive sports equipment, the mediocre athlete might increase the consequences of innate talent. Moreover, fundamental aspects of hard working relate to this reality that the demerits of being diligent pertain to consistent. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of dying from participating is correlated negatively with impressive accomplishment. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of bringing out the best exercise.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of adventure sports far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of increasing your abilities prove the significance of phenomenal success, but also pinpoints of throwing achievement implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7380952381 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26999537316 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.698412698413 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4134614228 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0508917037473 0.242375264174 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.015578368452 0.0925447433944 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0294645723615 0.071462118173 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0268035134783 0.151781067708 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017262839344 0.0609392437508 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.