The only thing that interferes my learning is my education- Albert Einstein.
discuss this statement and give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of the traditional education system and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that distance learning highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that new generation of learning method can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From teacher-led lessons standpoint, self-study can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that hardworking, as well as being diligent, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered 80% high self-motivated. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both internal motivation and innate talent can be seen.
Within the realm of educational equity, educational quality might increase the consequences of practical learning. Moreover, fundamental aspects of vocational training relate to this reality that the demerits of tertiary education pertain to fundamental knowledge. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of academic achievement is correlated negatively with 50% deprived of school. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of e-learning.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of solid-education far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of enable intellectual property to prove the significance of phenomenal successful, but also pinpoints of progressive accomplishment implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...academic experiment which deciphered 80% high self-motivated. Thus, beneficial ra...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.97570850202 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47948328264 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.692307692308 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8406747649 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5833333333 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113449687772 0.242375264174 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0335731618017 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0277900614029 0.071462118173 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0570120105434 0.151781067708 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181736670273 0.0609392437508 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.4 11.5310837438 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.66 8.32886699507 140% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.