the use of newspaper will be less important in future.do you agree or disagree with this statement?explain with reasons and examples.

Essay topics:

the use of newspaper will be less important in future.
do you agree or disagree with this statement?
explain with reasons and examples.

Recently, the phenomenon of the newspaper and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that print media highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the local media can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From deforestation standpoint, less cutting trees can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that widespread use of computers, as well as the ubiquity use of the internet, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered globalization. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both surfing websites and giving information can be seen.

Within the realm of socio-economic improvement, modern society might increase the consequences of social media. Moreover, fundamental aspects of newspaper news relate to this reality that the demerits of keeping up with the latest news pertaining to acquire the latest news. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of mass media is correlated negatively with social interaction. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of advertisement.

To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the ubiquity use of online newspapers far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of target audience prove the significance of local news, but also pinpoints of global village implications.

Votes
Average: 9 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6015625 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29502317661 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65234375 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0100998509 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164655145789 0.242375264174 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457722948308 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423885997754 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0834885539349 0.151781067708 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0150476870747 0.0609392437508 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.