do you support dangerous activity like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not. what are the reasons for that?
Recently, the phenomenon of the dangerous activities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the interesting activity highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the adventure activity can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From bungee jumping standpoint, skiing can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that facing your fears, as well as improving your physical ability, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered the expensive sports facilities. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both hardworking and innate talent can be seen.
Within the realm of being diligent, being consistent might increase the consequences of the high self-motivated. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the high-risk sport relate to this reality that the demerits of more rush of adrenalin pertain to glamorous activities. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of sports is correlated negatively with 80% dying from participation. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the extreme sports.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the exciting sports far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of overcome with fears prove the significance of improving self-confidence, but also pinpoints of phenomenal success implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72156862745 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31524503969 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670588235294 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8190350907 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.583333333 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.075023314266 0.242375264174 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.024941197664 0.0925447433944 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0285815676868 0.071462118173 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0402703649212 0.151781067708 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026332800334 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.