successful spors stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters.
do you support it or not?
Recently, the phenomenon of the successful sports stars and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that glamorous film stars are highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the efficient model for youngsters can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From utopia standpoint, hard working can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that innate talent, as well as being diligent, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered 80% following the movie stars. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both fame and money can be seen.
Within the realm of being the self-motivated person, internal motivation might increase the consequences of phenomenal success. Moreover, fundamental aspects of imitating film stars relate to this reality that the demerits of the social interaction pertain to making a breakthrough. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of lack of role model is correlated negatively with 75% following young movie stars. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of inspiration.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of mass media stars far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of advertisement player prove the significance of copied lifestyle, but also pinpoints of x implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56031128405 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23661039797 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673151750973 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9381466214 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.083333333 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197178410904 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557684543267 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509391783969 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105519213813 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078623158695 0.0609392437508 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.76 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.