Recently, the phenomenon of xenophobia and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that discrimination attitude highly beneficial, the issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that migrating to the western countries can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From racism standpoint, high level of lifestyle can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that stigmatization, as well as social stigma, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered 80 percent of social interaction. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the patriot and ethnocentrism can be seen.
Within the realm of refugees, strangers might increase the consequences of migration rate. Moreover, fundamental aspects of cultural empathy relate to this reality that the demerits of foreign culture pertain to the foreign language. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the lower standard of living is correlated negatively with third world nation. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of nationalism.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of foreign culture far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of exploitation loving the significance of prejudice against other people, but also pinpoints of the adjustment process implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... exploitation loving the significance of prejudice against other people, but also...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, third, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71084337349 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31741007314 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674698795181 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3080633239 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0836868778283 0.242375264174 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0275276167437 0.0925447433944 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404698396718 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0438267332482 0.151781067708 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442194014866 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.29 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.