do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? what is the reason for that?
Recently, the phenomenon of dangerous activities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that improving your self-confidence highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that overcome fears can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From stressful situation standpoint, the serious characteristic can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that facing up to the challenge, as well as adventure sports, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered dying from the participant. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both fame and money can be seen.
Within the realm of the mediocre athlete, expensive equipment might increase the consequences of providing facilities. Moreover, fundamental aspects of workout relate to this reality that the demerits of character development pertain to sportsman. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of dangerous sport is correlated negatively with spectators. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of light exercise.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of then bungee jumping far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of increasing your ability prove the significance of mental growth, but also pinpoints of social interaction implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g your ability prove the significance of mental growth, but also pinpoints of soc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, then, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 246.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77235772358 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33447333272 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.69512195122 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1395213631 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.333333333 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.06261887189 0.242375264174 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0194899031493 0.0925447433944 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0308624425678 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0352332686188 0.151781067708 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284049433086 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.11 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.