Some say that music is as important as other subjects in school to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of the music and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that important subject in school highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that promoting learning can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From children learning standpoint, the brain function can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that innate talent, as well as internal motivation, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered the higher efficiency in the mental activity. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the piano and keyboard can be seen.
Within the realm of broadening child horizon, enable intellectual property might increase the consequences of equal education. Moreover, fundamental aspects of equity learning relate to this reality that the demerits of musicology pertain to learning method. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of traditional education is correlated negatively with the high speed of learning. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the traditional education system.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the career music progression far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of climbing learning ladder prove the significance of promotion of music, but also pinpoints of children social interaction implications
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to relate'
Suggestion: to relate
... fundamental aspects of equity learning relate to this reality that the demerits of mu...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...earning ladder prove the significance of promotion of music, but also pinpoints o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71042471042 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1965334677 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664092664093 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3657192393 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.25 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14761969083 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439288202431 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504892931992 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0827967042934 0.151781067708 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496994192672 0.0609392437508 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.08 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.