The illiterates of the 21 st century are not those who can not read and write, but those who cannot learn - Alvin Toffler. explain the statement and do you agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of illiterates of the 21st century and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although it is contested by many that reading is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the writing can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the ability to learn, computer literacy skill can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the modern society, as well as new learning method, are inextricably bound up. As according to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experience which deciphered the new generation of E-learning. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both the modern era and updating can be seen.
Within the realm of keeping to learning, creativity might increase the consequences of intellectual ability. Moreover, the fundamental essence of the traditional education system relates to this reality that the demerits of the ubiquity of the internet pertain to the widespread use of the computer. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the definition of literacy is correlated negatively with an artificial intelligence. Hence, it is correct to presume that the preconceived notion of online friends.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of new technology far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only does the advantage of smart gadgets prove the significance of improving personal imagination, but also the pinpoint x implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'artificial intelligence'.
Suggestion: artificial intelligence
... literacy is correlated negatively with an artificial intelligence. Hence, it is correct to presume that t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45555555556 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23829325569 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640740740741 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 1.71428571429 350% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.01159885 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.75 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.068018354823 0.242375264174 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0207728125867 0.0925447433944 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268523382469 0.071462118173 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0356163451041 0.151781067708 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375891053405 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.93 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.