The environment we live in is in danger. What are the underlying causes? Who is responsible to combat this?

Essay topics:

The environment we live in is in danger. What are the underlying causes? Who is responsible to combat this?

Recently, the phenomenon of the living environment and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that environment problem is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded as thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the natural resources can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From reducing noxious gases standpoint, the environment destroying can provide the environment with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that natural eco-system, as well as the environmental crisis, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment, which deciphered 80 percent of the environment depletion relate to climate change. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both global warming and the melting ice polar can be seen.

Within the realm of the emission of greenhouse gases, destruction of ozone layer might increase the consequences of toxic gases. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of environmental problem relate to this reality that the demerits of private car pertain to the public transportation. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of pollution is correlated negatively with metropolis area. Hence, it is correct to presume that the preconceived notion of encouraged policies.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of endanger environment far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantage of irreversible damge to the environment prove the significance of the government, but also pinpoint of individual corporation implications.

Votes
Average: 3.6 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'gases'' or 'gas's'?
Suggestion: gases'; gas's
...ut this essay. From reducing noxious gases standpoint, the environment destroying ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70740740741 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36338103128 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644444444444 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9135921229 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.416666667 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108351040688 0.242375264174 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0341309848146 0.0925447433944 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301851333226 0.071462118173 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0605869544429 0.151781067708 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295192526425 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.1 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.