in a war of ideas, it is people who get killed. does a common man suffer from a groups ideology?
express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of the war of idea and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that suffering from groups ideology highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the personal attitude can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a dogmatic person standpoint, being biased can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that opposing ideologies, as well as the clash of opinion, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered different political belief. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both conflict of the idea and innocent people can be seen.
Within the realm of respecting other opinions, terrorism might increase the consequences of clash of ideologies. Moreover, fundamental aspects of violent relate to this reality that the demerits of different point of views pertain to be in a fear of your life. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of religious views is correlated negatively with freedom of actions. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of selfish interests.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the destruction of society far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of general public prove the significance of showing humanity, but also pinpoints of sharing information implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 201, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...rawbacks. Not only do the advantages of general public prove the significance of showing human...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18557813392 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656488549618 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.799759212 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.083333333 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.092566425178 0.242375264174 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0261791188844 0.0925447433944 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342094909587 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0469488132715 0.151781067708 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348228911849 0.0609392437508 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.