if you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/ subject will you choose?
Recently, the phenomenon of climate change and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that global warming highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that rising the weather temperature can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From drought standpoint, bushfire can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that weather condition, as well as rising sea-levels, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered the coastal disorders. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both pollutant particles and greenhouse gases can be seen.
Within the realm of noxious gases, the biosphere might increase the consequences of the atmosphere. Moreover, fundamental aspects of soil erosion relate to this reality that the demerits of the ozone depletion pertain to less rainy weather. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the eco-friendly product is correlated negatively with fossil fuel. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of carbon emission.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of controlling weather temperature far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the government support prove the significance of public transportation, but also pinpoints of geotermal energy implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rnment support prove the significance of public transportation, but also pinpoint...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74493927126 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26246966351 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.684210526316 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4457941564 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5833333333 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0355532801944 0.242375264174 15% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0110693150278 0.0925447433944 12% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0159053323093 0.071462118173 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0187220266297 0.151781067708 12% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188090761158 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.28 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.