some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. support your point of view with details from your own experiences.
Recently, the phenomenon of placing the advertisement and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although it is contested by many that public school is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the additional funding can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From exploiting children standpoint, corporate sponsors can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that promoting a product, as well as marketing communications, are inextricably bound up. As according to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experience which deciphered 80 percent of print advertisements. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both propaganda and mass media can be seen.
Within the realm of crowdsourcing, target audiences might increase the consequences of sales promotions. Moreover, the fundamental essence of human billboards relates to this reality that the demerits of distracting students pertain to corporations. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of Ad campaigns is correlated negatively with the convincing student to purchase. Hence, it is correct to presume that the preconceived notion of the commersial message.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of a student-run advertising agency far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantage of a school-run ad agency prove the significance of fundraising programs, but also the pinpoint branding implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71428571429 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45598022093 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675675675676 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 1.71428571429 350% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3213925856 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.333333333 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116807512522 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331635102609 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319751964841 0.071462118173 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0612651773477 0.151781067708 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391083540461 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.45 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.