with all the problems in the world today, some people think that spending money on space exploration is a complete waste.
the money can be better spent on other causes. what is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of space exploration and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that a lot of problem in the world highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that money can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From asteroid mining standpoint, promoting space tourism can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the alien space, as well as the first spacewalk, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered the first moon landing. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the space shuttle program and extraterrestrial species can be seen.
Within the realm of astronauts, astronomy might increase the consequences of human spaceflight. Moreover, fundamental aspects of space traveling relate to this reality that the demerits of spacecraft pertain to environmental problems. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of x is correlated negatively with space. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the planet.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of welfare programs far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the global warming prove the significance of ozone depletion, but also pinpoints of moon landing implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of problems'.
Suggestion: a lot of problems
...debate. Although contested by many that a lot of problem in the world highly beneficial, such is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 248.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56451612903 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27008919613 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66935483871 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6684173283 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139139776226 0.242375264174 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419084867409 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422815361663 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0706870932143 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530516687814 0.0609392437508 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.12 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.