Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations and reading?
The role of placing adverts in school premises and corridors is controversial and has drawn attention from the public. While many academics claim that this helps to boost the funding for schools, but others argue that it has some serious consequences on children. In my view, schools should never promote such strategies to collect money. This essay will further elaborate on both sides and thus, will lead to a logical conclusion.
To begin with, schools are a natural learning environment and by placing adverts or promoting brands, the whole purpose of the school gets diverted. Moreover, schools offer a platform to learn and train the younger ones, but using them as an intentional customer can distract them and lose focus on their studies. For instance, posting images of famous celebs or personalities promoting alcohol can resort to binge drinking habits in children which is unacceptable. Thus, schools should highly be involved in child development and plan to do things only in favour of them.
Nevertheless, there are some advantages that can overwhelm the potential impacts of advertising. The most conspicuous one is that there are often low or middle budget schools that lack funds or grants and by this, they will get support from concerned organizations. For example, small budget schools that educate poor children, investing money on adverts can bring a stream of revenue or attract governments grants. Hence, raising money from advertisements can become a resource to meet the study expenses of many impoverished children.
This essay discussed how placing advertisements in the schools is a source of revenue and damage to children’s future. In my opinion, the drawbacks of advertisements outweigh its benefits and therefore, schools should never promote such adverts that divert students from their path.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 8.36945812808 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33793103448 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89355345643 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610344827586 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.803344477 50.4703680194 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.571428571 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.25397266985 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246696510746 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821106568945 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374801071991 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148800306639 0.151781067708 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154959309043 0.0609392437508 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.