The only thing that interferes my learning is my education-Albert Einstein.
discuss this statement and give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of the traditional education system and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that improving learning skills highly beneficial, the issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that new-generation of e-learning can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the educational equally standpoint, the educational equity can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the fundamental knowledge, as well as practical training, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered 80% of solid education. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both academic achievement and tertiary education can be seen.
Within the realm of distance learning, vocational training might increase the consequences of self-study. Moreover, fundamental aspects of new learning method relate to this reality that the demerits of self-motivated pertain to being diligent and consistent. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of teacher-led lessons is correlated negatively with enabling intellectual property. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of formal education.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of autonomous learning far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of learning management system prove the significance of improving creativity, but also pinpoints of internal motivation implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.96837944664 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40546349949 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664031620553 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8915784275 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.833333333 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128864368707 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0381242851706 0.0925447433944 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0257867939775 0.071462118173 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0674314592481 0.151781067708 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201287074205 0.0609392437508 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.35 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.54 8.32886699507 139% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.