Give an example of an accomplished person whose success did not have any effect on his bad neighborhood.
many people think that regions affect successfully person. what is your opinion about the native active region?
and accomplishment persons influence the region he belongs to?
Recently, the phenomenon of the native environment and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that underprivileged region is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that utopia can be plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From lack of role model standpoint, being diligent and consistent can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that family structure, as well as a gifted person, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered being self-motivated. Thus, beneficial ramifications of innate talent and internal motivation can be seen.
Within the realm of hard-working, personal growth might provide the consequences of impressive accomplishment. Moreover, the fundamental essence of phenomenal success relates to this reality that the demerits of a dramatic improvement pertain to win the respect. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of failing miserably is correlated negatively with bringing out the best.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of dashing someones hope far outweigh its drawback. Not only do the advantage of a residential neighborhood, but also pinpoint the crowing achievement implications.
Comments
I find this essay to be
I find this essay to be totally off topic. This essay does not talk about any famous person or about religion. You have used your own example? :/
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 234.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74358974359 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39673432524 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.700854700855 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1345738563 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.181818182 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100875499583 0.242375264174 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0291958858335 0.0925447433944 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0261597516454 0.071462118173 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0474341162583 0.151781067708 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195942411882 0.0609392437508 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.63 8.32886699507 140% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.