- Some students focus on their academic lessons, while extracurricular activities also play an important role. Do you agree or not?
Recently, the phenomenon of studying academic lessons and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the academic performance is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that improving knowledge can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, extracurricular activities can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of training courses, as well as extracurricular exercises, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the academic career. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both intellectual abilities and mental capabilities apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the important role of extracurricular lessons might increase the consequences of the modern method. Moreover, fundamental aspects of practical skills could relate to this reality that the demerits of the academic qualification pertain to the academic research. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of learning environment is correlated negatively with educational development. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of well-educated.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the school curricular far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the necessary information prove the significance of homework assignments, but also pinpoint classroom activities implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93798449612 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48405417518 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662790697674 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7216574861 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.666666667 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20098084932 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551928343499 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473716805146 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0989110608693 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391400388142 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.17 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.23 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.