The space travel is fantastic these days, and people are very fascinated towards it, but there are many environmental problems on our planet. What is your opinion? Should money be spent on space travel or environmental issues?

Essay topics:

The space travel is fantastic these days, and people are very fascinated towards it, but there are many environmental problems on our planet. What is your opinion? Should money be spent on space travel or environmental issues?

In contemporary society, the controversial topic about governments should focus on people’">people’s life or technologies used for space travel never fails to attract public attention. Some people believe thatspace:pre"> authorities should concentrate on space travel technologies. While others are convinced of the opposite view. As far as I am concerned, I tend to be the advocate of the former opinion, and this essay will discuss the same.

To commence with, there are a lot of solid reasons to account for why governments should pay more attention to technologies in space travel. The most important one is that we may find new resources or technology. To be specific, we can emigrate to another planet. A recent survey, for instance, conducted by the National Bureau of Statistics in China shows that seventy percent of people approve that we should emphasize space travel technologies.

Moving on to consider the opposing arguments of critics, they claim that it is a waste of time to make an effort to develop technologies for space travel. Well, this view seems reasonable on the surface, but they ignore the fact that technologies used for space travel can also be used for enhancing people’">people’s living standards. As Aristotle once said,” you cannot have all the good things at the same time. you always have to compromise at one point or another.”

To sum up, taking into account all the above-mentioned reasons, we may safely draw the conclusion that it is vital for governments to aim at technologies used for space travel.

Votes
Average: 10 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ncentrate on space travel technologies. While others are convinced of the opposite vi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this essay will discuss the same. To commence with, there are a lot of sol...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...phasize space travel technologies. Moving on to consider the opposing argum...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 377, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...living standards. As Aristotle once said,' you cannot have all the good things at...
^^^^^^
Line 17, column 439, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: You
...e all the good things at the same time. you always have to compromise at one point ...
^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ise at one point or another.' To sum up, taking into account all the a...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, well, while, for instance, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47222222222 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.05431091702 2.71678728327 149% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603174603175 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.426567973 50.4703680194 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.916666667 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199697568155 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804982075013 0.0925447433944 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566310270655 0.071462118173 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132329972214 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043567087116 0.0609392437508 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.