Student travel to study is overrated, we have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really required for higher studies?

Recently, we have witnessed massive growth in the area of international education. Mammoth students are blindly traveling either to foreign countries or remote places, out of a local place for pursuing their academic dreams. Proponents are debating over this phenomenon, many support this trend by highlighting its benefits, however, others have opposite views stating its detrimental effects. In this article, I will analyze both sides before deriving any conclusion.

To begin with, there are paramount advantages in traveling to other places for the study purpose. First, it not only provide world-class academic knowledge in a specialized field but also can be game-changing in terms of quality and level of education due to the state of the art faculties. For instance, we can hardly find the best technical education in our domestic native land, as compared to the MIT Institute of USA. Moreover, traveling as a whole can be a life-changing experience.

On the other hand, there are negligible disadvantages of traveling to study, as it is exaggerated and over-rated. Not all section of society can afford it, due to its exorbitant cost. For example, local colleges have produced some brilliant scholars like Steve Jobs of Apple computers and Bill Gates of Microsoft. Furthermore, we must check local resources before embarking upon traveling.

In conclusion, from the above example, it is evident that traveling for the study is not beneficial all the times, and one must consider all options holistically and cognitively.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun support seems to be countable; consider using: 'many supports'.
Suggestion: many supports
...ents are debating over this phenomenon, many support this trend by highlighting its benefits...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
...ality and level of education due to the state of the art faculties. For instance, we can hardly ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39419087137 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03217595314 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663900414938 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1729322317 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5384615385 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.25397266985 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235195889849 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736041316843 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687941416 0.071462118173 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130873860986 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268525030332 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.1260098522 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.