Student travel to study is overrated, we have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really required for higher studies?
In this day and age, student travel has become a debatable issue among people from all walks of life all around the world. Although international studies are regarded as thoroughly both positive and constructive by many individuals, there are a number of people hold an opposite view. I am inclined to strongly believe that international education is quite beneficial for nations since students can gain more experience and knowledge.
To begin with, there are a number of reasons why I support students should travel overseas to study. First and foremost is that globalization is attributed to international education. Secondly, it is occasionally argued that students would be familiar with diverse cultures and therefore their horizons would be widened. From my personal experience, when I studied abroad, I found out about different cultures. Consequently, it is quite conspicuous that travelling for studying is quite advantageous.
However, there is no doubt that student travel for education can provide individuals with various negative outcomes. Despite this possibility, it is highly claimed that homesickness is negatively correlated with studying abroad. By way of example, a recent academic research conducted by Oxford university researchers in 2012 has shown that students who study overseas are more effective in their courses and are more self-sufficient. Thus, it is quite obvious that international education can lead to success.
To put it in a nutshell, while there are several persuasive arguments on both sides, I am of the opinion that we would have brilliant researchers if they study abroad.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this day and age, student travel has become a debatable issue among peopl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.492 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14839641723 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1760564288 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.615384615 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.25397266985 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289334098881 0.242375264174 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918739217762 0.0925447433944 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652367900028 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171869597613 0.151781067708 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258340247074 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.